Report Icon

Incident Report – 08/23/2019
3017 SE La Vida Ct, Visalia, CA 93292

Share

Download Full Report

Download Full Report
Price
$4.99
FeatureCheck
Includes Owner Information
FeatureCheck
Formatted for Commercial, Legal, and other Professional Usage
FeatureCheck
Download as PDF
Buy Report
Money-back Guarantee.

Summary

On August 23, 2019, Visalia Fire Department responded to an EMS call at 3017 SE La Vida Ct, Visalia, CA 93292, a residential use, 1-or-2 family dwelling.

The alarm was received at 9:19 AM, 3 EMS personnel arrived at 9:25 AM, and the last unit was cleared at 9:41 AM. The time to arrive was 6 minutes and the total incident time was 22 minutes.

The following actions were taken during the incident: provide basic life support (BLS) and provide manpower.

Sponsored

Location

Type Street address
Address 3017 SE La Vida Ct, Visalia, CA 93292
County Tulare County
State CA
City VISALIA
Zip Code 93292
Mixed Use Residential use
Property Use 1 or 2 family dwelling
Detector Alerted Occupants Unknown

Timeline

  • Alarm

    Alarm received at

  • Arrived

    Arrived at

    Alarm to arrival: 6 minutes

  • Last Unit Cleared

    Last unit cleared at

    Alarm to last unit cleared: 22 minutes

Response

Incident Type EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury
Department Station S51
Mutual Aid Given/Received None
Resources Include Mutual Aid No
Shift C
Alarms 1
District F95

Personnel

Support Personnel 0
EMS Personnel 3
Other Personnel 0

Fire Department

Name Visalia Fire Department
Department Type Career
Address 420 N Burke St
Visalia, CA 93292-6516
Phone (559) 713-4266
Website https://www.visalia.city/depts/fire/default.asp

Actions Taken

First Action Taken Provide basic life support (BLS)
Second Action Taken Provide manpower

Metadata

Incident Key CA_54045_08232019_0823108_0
State California
Fire Department ID 54045
Incident Date 08/23/2019
Incident Number 0823108
Exposure Number 0
NFIRS Version 5.0

EMS Report

Patient Description

Provider Impression/Assessment Other impression/assessment
Patient Age 81

Procedures Used

Procedure Used No treatment
Sponsored